THE epidemic of gun violence in our country is a crisis. Gun deaths and injuries constitute one of the greatest threats to public health and to the safety of the American people. Every year, more than 30,000 Americans have their lives cut short by guns. Suicides. Domestic violence. Gang shootouts. Accidents. Hundreds of thousands of Americans have lost brothers and sisters, or buried their own children. We’re the only advanced nation on earth that sees this kind of mass violence with this frequency. Read more
Our Thanks to Paula Stephens, MA, a wellness expert, and founder of Crazy Good Grief for creating this:
RESPONSE – SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2013
I write in response to Andy Caldwell’s September 25 op-ed attacking Senator Jackson for her support of Senate Bill 755, a measure that will help reduce gun violence by prohibiting repeat alcohol and drug offenders from purchasing or possessing firearms for ten years. Mr. Caldwell claims there is no nexus connecting alcohol and drugs crimes with firearms abuse. He’s just plain wrong. Numerous studies confirm the significantly higher safety risks posed by alcoholics and drug addicts with firearms.
This connection is so significant that the California Narcotics Officers Association, whose officers put their lives in danger while arresting armed criminals who are intoxicated or under the influence of controlled substances, joined Senator Jackson in supporting this important legislation.
Senate Bill 755, authored by State Senator Lois Wolk, simply adds additional crimes to the list of misdemeanors that already prevent a person from possessing a firearm for 10 years after conviction. Existing law prohibits a person from possessing a firearm if the person has 1) been convicted of two or more crimes while under the influence of drugs or alcohol within a three-year period, or 2) been convicted of possessing any controlled substance for sale. SB 755 would merely add two convictions for driving under the influence within a 3- year period to the ban. One slip up would have no impact on that individual’s right to possess a firearm.
Mr. Caldwell at least concedes that drunk driving exhibits impaired judgment. However, he doesn’t acknowledge that the penalties for one DUI conviction are so considerable that one’s willingness to continue to drive drunk indicate a glaring lack of judgment.
We also take issue with Caldwell’s assertion that there is no connection between an individual convicted of a DUI and the reckless use of firearms. Statistics show that the combination of alcohol abusers and guns creates a serious threat to public safety.
The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, found that firearm owners who reported they drink and drive were twice as likely as other firearm owners to drive with a loaded firearm. They were also twice as likely to have firearms at home that were loaded and not locked. Firearm owners who drank heavily (at least 60 drinks a month on average) were also more likely to engage in risky behaviors with firearms.
Contrary to Caldwell’s assertions about gun deaths and hardened criminals, the majority of gun deaths are suicides, and the heavy use of alcohol has been positively linked with firearm suicides.
The California Chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians supports firearm safety legislation, including SB 755, stating, “When we first put on the white coat we took an oath to protect and to heal. We carry with us memories of patients who have been victims of firearm violence. We must embrace common-sense solutions to this problem while researching the underpinnings of firearm violence and working to address related societal issues.”
Opponents of sensible gun violence prevention always raise the Second Amendment red flag. Gun ownership is a right that must be exercised responsibly and gun regulations are also a Constitutional right. Yet the intervention proposed by SB 755 enjoys strong public support that spans the traditional disagreement over “gun control” initiatives. A nationwide public opinion survey (New England Journal of Medicine) found that:
- 75% of the general population
- 71% of self-identified firearm owners
- and 64% self-identified NRA members
endorsed “prohibiting a person convicted of two or more crimes involving alcohol or drugs within a 3-year period from having a gun for 10 years.”
Who is Mr. Caldwell hoping to protect, individuals with a history of DUIs or the general public? We think protecting the public from individuals who have proven they are likely to engage in behavior that threatens public safety should be everyone’s primary concern, even Andy Caldwell’s.
Toni Wellen, Chair
Coalition Against Gun Violence
Sunday’s New York Times ran an eye-opening article about children accidentally gaining access to a gun in their own homes with tragic consequences. Assemblymember Phil Ting’s AB 231 would help prevent these tragedies by making it a crime for gun owners to leave a gun where a child can access it. As a Californian, you can help by urging Governor Jerry Brown to sign this measure into law. Just click here to sign the petition in support of AB 231. Assemblymember Ting’s Office will be sure to let the Governor know how many people support this bill. Please do it quickly – the Governor may act any day now.
” Children shot accidentally — usually by other children — are collateral casualties of the accessibility of guns in America, their deaths all the more devastating for being eminently preventable.
They die in the households of police officers and drug dealers, in broken homes and close-knit families, on rural farms and in city apartments. Some adults whose guns were used had tried to store them safely; others were grossly negligent. Still others pulled the trigger themselves, accidentally fracturing their own families while cleaning a pistol or hunting.”
Read this Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence publication,, it examines the history of success in enacting smart gun laws in California and discusses how those laws have contributed to a significant drop in gun death rates in the state.The study highlights these key points:
- Gun violence is not a problem without solutions
- We know what works and we have seen the difference it has made in California, and we’re already seeing the same success in states around the country
In 1989, a catastrophic event changed the perception of gun violence in California. A gunman took an assault rifle to Cleveland Elementary School in Stockton, where he killed five children and wounded 29 others as well as one teacher. The parallels between the Cleveland Elementary School shooting and the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut are very similar, including young victims, a troubled gunman, and a military-style rifle.
The Stockton shooting shocked California and the nation, igniting calls for change. California legislature responded to the demand for action, adopting the first assault weapons ban in the country that same year.
Read the full The California Model: Twenty Years of Putting Safety First Report.